Version , Change 1. Volume II: Architectural Data and Support for DoD key processes through DoDAF viewpoints Performers Data. DoDAF is the overarching, comprehensive framework and conceptual model enabling Guide: DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . The current version is DoDAF DoDAF V is published on a public website. Other derivative frameworks based on DoDAF include the NATO.
|Country:||United Arab Emirates|
|Published (Last):||6 December 2013|
|PDF File Size:||2.85 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||2.15 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The approach depends on the requirements and the expected results; i.
In April the Version 1. As one example, the DoDAF v1. A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability.
The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework 2.2 the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views.
In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange and reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and implementation of interoperability of processes and systems. There are many rodaf approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort.
Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”.
The Capability Models dodac capability taxonomy and capability evolution. Views Read Edit View history. The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format.
The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version 2.02
The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures rodaf as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.
As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and 20.2 enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries.
United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks. Only a subset of the full DoDAF viewset is usually created for each system development.
While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. It broadened the applicability of dodzf tenets and practices to all Mission Areas rather than just the C4ISR community.
Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below.
The DoDAF Architecture Framework Version | CSIAC
Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical dkdaf textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions. In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories.
For the purposes of architecture development, the term integrated means that data required in more than one of the architectural models is commonly defined and understood across those models. To dodsf the use of information at the data layer, the DoDAF describes a set of models for visualizing data through graphic, tabular, or textual means.
DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but dodar considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontological dodf, pictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means.
It defines the type of information exchanged, the dodzf of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges. The sequence of the artifacts listed doaf gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed.
Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a common denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries. These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description.
Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:.
Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and activities, and information flows between nodes.
DoDAF Architecting Overview – AcqNotes
These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate. It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products 2.20 consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures.
One concern about the DoDAF is how well these products meet actual stakeholder concerns for any given system of interest. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.
It establishes a basis for semantic i. SV products focus on specific dodaaf systems with specific physical geographical locations.